Summary Tron Inc. remains fundamentally unattractive, trading at a 1.5x premium to its underlying TRX crypto holdings. Staking yields are modest at 4–5% annually, below Treasury bills or CDs, and translate to a 2.5% earnings yield on TRON’s market cap. TRON lacks operational business, offers no diversification, and is dominated by insider ownership, with over 85% controlled by the Sun family. I maintain a Hold rating, as TRON’s value is speculative, with little justification for its substantial premium over direct TRX ownership. I analyzed TRON Inc. ( TRON ) several months ago . The company's core proposition is to own and stake TRX crypto tokens, positioning itself as a crypto treasury vehicle, similar to other vehicles that have emerged recently around Bitcoin or Ethereum. At the time, my main concerns were twofold. First, the concept of owning crypto itself for small staking rewards was risky. Second, and more importantly, the stock was trading at a very large premium to the value of the underlying crypto assets on its balance sheet, independent of one’s view on TRX itself. That assessment has proven directionally correct. Since my report, the stock is down close to 50%, while the underlying TRX token has declined only moderately. Despite the drawdown, the company still trades at a premium of at least 1.5x to the value of its crypto holdings, which I continue to view as excessive. In addition, the company’s value is entirely determined by a highly speculative crypto asset, with no meaningful operating business or diversification. Finally, the staking rewards make up for a yield to the company that is less than what a bank pays for a CD. For these reasons, I maintain a Hold rating on TRON. Confirmations on share count and token holdings One of the key elements of my original thesis relied on a mental 'back of the envelope' calculation regarding the eventual number of shares outstanding and the quantity of TRX tokens held by the company post-conversions, given the lack of proper updated filings. At the time, I assumed that following the August 2025 warrant conversion, the company would end up with roughly 440 million shares outstanding (fully converted basis) and approximately 677 million TRX tokens on the balance sheet. The most recent 10-Q confirms these assumptions almost exactly. Note 6 of the filing shows TRX holdings of roughly 677 million tokens. On the equity side, the company reported 257 million shares outstanding as of November 2025, with an additional ~200 million shares issuable upon conversion of the Series B preferred shares. This implies an as-converted share count of approximately 457 million, slightly above my initial estimate but well within the same order of magnitude. Staking profits are modest Another important data point provided since my last article is information on effective profitability from token staking. During 3Q25, the company converted the majority of its TRX holdings into approximately 550 million units of a staked version of the token, referred to as sTRX (again, Note 6 of the 10-Q). This instrument accrues staking rewards by appreciating relative to TRX over time, rather than through explicit token distributions. During the quarter, the company recorded approximately $2.2 million in unrecognized staking income, reported below the operating income line. If annualized, and assuming an average capital base of roughly $200 million (corresponding to the average market value of the 677 million TRX held during the quarter), this implies an annualized yield of around 4.5%. Q3 may not fully reflect a steady-state run rate, as some staking-related transactions occurred in August 2025, meaning the quarter likely captures less than a full three months of rewards. However, if Q4 confirms a similar yield profile, the return on owning and staking TRX is comparable to, or even lower than, the yield on short-term Treasury bills. This comparison is before accounting for the fact that TRON stockholders are effectively paying at least a 50% premium to access those underlying tokens. That means the return on the assets is less than 5%, and on the market cap, even lower. Staking income is the company’s only meaningful source of economic return. On an annual basis, a ~$9 million pre-tax unrecognized staking income stream is not particularly compelling for a company with a current market capitalization north of $350 million. Even if taxes are deferred and therefore we consider the pre-tax for now, this is only a 2.5% earnings yield, or a P/E of 40x. The company also recorded the unrealized change in fair value of the tokens independent of the staking rewards (I would presume based on the price variation of the TRX token, but I am not fully sure), for a gain of $16 million in the quarter. However, this type of gain is not from doing any business or providing any service (like staking, at the limit), but rather simply from value appreciation, which could reverse and is not a recurrent source of profitability. Additional related-party investment In December, a company controlled by Justin Sun, founder of the TRX blockchain and son of Weike Sun (Chairman of TRON and its largest shareholder), purchased an additional 13 million shares of TRON in exchange for $18 million, paid in stablecoins. The Sun family already controls more than 85% of the outstanding shares, and this transaction further consolidates that position. The investment also helps the company maintain a healthy cash balance of potentially up to $28 million, given that the 3Q25 balance sheet listed $10 million in cash holdings. This cash balance, in addition to the TRX holdings, dispels any concern about liquidity needs in the near or mid-term future. Valuation remains unattractive On a purely treasury basis, owning TRON stock instead of owning TRX directly remains unattractive. The company’s equity is valued at approximately $350 million, while the underlying crypto assets are worth closer to $200 million at current prices. The implied premium is substantial and difficult to justify in the absence of operational leverage, superior risk management, or materially higher returns than those available to direct token holders. Looking at the crypto asset itself, staking rewards in the range of 4–5% per year are not particularly compelling. These returns are lower than those available on insured bank certificates of deposit, let alone Treasury bills, and they are not remotely commensurate with the volatility and risk profile of a second-tier crypto asset. The only context in which owning TRON stock could make sense is as a speculative vehicle for exposure to an increase in the price of TRX, particularly for investors who, for regulatory or operational reasons, are unable to purchase the token directly on a crypto exchange. I cannot speak meaningfully to that part of the thesis, as it falls squarely within crypto price speculation rather than fundamental analysis. As an equity investment, TRON offers little appeal. It has no operating business, no diversified revenue streams, modest staking income, concentrated ownership, and trades at a large premium to the value of its underlying assets. Regardless of one’s view on crypto markets more broadly, these characteristics make the stock unattractive from a fundamental perspective. For these reasons, I maintain a Hold rating.
Brace Yourself for the Next Big Crypto Wave
