Pentagon‑funded MP Materials told investors this week that the rush into rare earth mining stocks is starting to look like a trap. The company said people should slow down and understand the real economics behind these projects before throwing money into anything that sounds like the next big thing. The warning came after months of wild price swings across U.S. rare earth stocks , where many retail traders jumped in, assuming more government deals would show up. The VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has jumped about 60% this year, and that move alone has drawn in speculators who think the U.S. is about to start printing national mining champions on demand. The Defense Department took a direct stake in MP in July. The government also set a price floor for the company and signed an offtake agreement covering the rare earth minerals and the magnets made from them. The goal is to reduce U.S. dependence on China, which currently dominates almost every part of the supply chain. The CEO of MP, James Litinsky, told investors during the company’s third‑quarter earnings call that this excitement is going to burn people if they don’t understand how long and expensive rare earth production really is. Litinsky said, “People need to be very clear‑eyed about what the structural economics are amidst all this excitement.” He added that “the vast majority of projects being promoted today simply will not work at virtually any price.” MP warns speculation is distorting expectations Litinsky called MP “America’s national champion” because it is the only rare earth miner currently producing in the United States. The company has deals with Apple, General Motors, and the Pentagon, and Litinsky said MP has a structural advantage because it is vertically integrated. In his words, “We’re years and billions ahead of others.” He pointed to Australia’s Lynas, saying it took nearly a decade for that company to stabilize production. He said MP expects to reach stable production levels about three years from the start of commissioning, which is a reminder that none of this is fast. A Trump administration official told CNBC that the White House is not against doing more deals like the one with MP, but said not every agreement will look the same. Litinsky also said the rare earth market is close to a structural oligopoly, meaning only a few companies can actually operate at scale. He argued that spreading government investments across dozens of new projects will not magically create a full supply chain. He said the government should continue pushing private investors to step in through grants, loans, and other support because, as he explained it, “If X dollars of capital can stimulate two or three X in private capital, they should be doing that as much as possible.” China adjusts export rules as U.S. tries to expand supply Rare earth minerals are used in magnets that power U.S. defense systems, semiconductor tools, electric vehicles, clean energy tech, and consumer electronics. China controls most of that supply chain, forcing the U.S. to rely heavily on imports. China has started working on a new licensing system that could allow exporters to apply for permits more smoothly. Industry sources said these permits may move faster, but they also said China has not removed the broad export controls introduced in April. The White House said China agreed to introduce general licenses and called that a de facto end to the controls. But industry insiders said that does not reflect what companies are seeing on the ground. Some Chinese officials said the licensing process could take months. Others said that even when the new permits roll out, it will not mean the earlier restrictions have been lifted. Litinsky said MP will act as a forerunner while the U.S. tries to build a broader supply chain that does not rely on China. He said: “In the very short term the administration has made sure we have a successful national champion in MP. We’re going to pave the path for broader supply.” Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.
