Cryptopolitan
2025-06-20 14:00:28

BBC mulls dragging Perplexity AI to court over unauthorized content use

British public broadcaster, the BBC has warned it will sue Perplexity, the AI search engine, for allegedly harvesting its content without permission. In a strongly worded letter seen by the Financial Times , the broadcaster demands that Perplexity halt all scraping of BBC articles, erase any existing copies, and submit “a proposal for financial compensation.” Failure to comply, the BBC says, will result in an injunction to stop the startup from using its material. BBC demands an injunction from Perplexity This is the first time the BBC has formally moved to defend its content against an AI outfit. Perplexity , based in San Francisco, doesn’t build its own language models like OpenAI or Google. Instead, it taps into existing ones, serving as a front‑end that pulls data, sometimes verbatim, from sites across the web. The BBC insists that Perplexity’s “default AI model” has been trained on entire chunks of its journalism, crossing from legitimate innovation into copyright infringement. “Perplexity’s tool directly competes with the BBC’s own services, circumventing the need for users to access those services,” said the BBC in their letter to the AI firm. “It is therefore highly damaging to the BBC, injuring the BBC’s reputation with audiences — including UK licence fee-payers who fund the BBC — and undermining their trust in the BBC.” BBC letter. Addressed to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, the BBC’s missive reveals evidence suggesting wholesale copying of BBC text into the startup’s AI training sets. The broadcaster wants the scraping to stop right away and for the firm to delete any cached BBC content. If Perplexity does not comply, the BBC says it will pursue a court‑ordered injunction, and possibly damages for unauthorized use of its intellectual property. Perplexity has pushed back, calling the BBC’s claims “manipulative and opportunistic.” The startup argues it merely provides an interface for existing models and points the finger at model providers rather than itself. In its statement to the FT, Perplexity accused the BBC of misunderstanding technology , the internet and IP law. BBC joins other publishers clashing with AI firms The BBC’s legal threat arrives as UK regulators consider a so‑called “opt‑out” regime that would allow AI firms to scrape copyrighted work unless publishers explicitly object. Media leaders, including BBC Director‑General Tim Davie, have warned that such a system would drain the £125 billion creative industry of its value. “We need to protect our national intellectual property.” Davie. “If we drift on, we will be in crisis,” Davie proclaimed at a recent conference. Other publishers are already taking a stand. In October, the New York Times (NYT) issued a cease‑and‑desist order to Perplexity, demanding it stop using NYT content in its AI models. Dow Jones, owner of The Wall Street Journal, filed a lawsuit accusing Perplexity of “massive illegal copying” and “free‑riding” on its journalism. The BBC itself has begun registering its news site content in the United States to claim statutory damages for unauthorized use. In response to mounting pressure, Perplexity launched a revenue‑sharing program, but many argue it comes too late. Major outlets like the Financial Times, Axel Springer, Hearst and News Corp have all signed licensing deals with OpenAI. Reuters agreed terms with Meta, while the Daily Mail’s parent struck a pact with ProRata.ai. Perplexity, however, remains without such formal arrangements. At the heart of the debate is a fundamental question: should AI developers freely mine the web for data, or must they pay for every byte of protected content? Proponents of open scraping argue that AI advancement depends on unfettered access to online information. Critics counter that unlicensed data harvesting undermines the viability of professional journalism. As the BBC and Perplexity prepare for what could become a landmark court fight, the outcome may rewrite the rules of engagement between AI and content owners. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Crypto 뉴스 레터 받기
면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.