Cryptopolitan
2025-07-14 21:00:57

Meta shareholders are suing the company’s board for allegedly failing to enforce privacy rules

Meta’s executives will meet in a Delaware court starting Wednesday over a lawsuit filed by three minority shareholders who allege that the company’s board of directors failed to enforce privacy rules. While some have complained about how it is almost impossible to hold big tech companies accountable, Meta has come under fire from within for prioritizing its CEO’s personal protection over user privacy. $5B data privacy scandal Meta’s executives, including its chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and former COO Sheryl Sandberg, will appear in a Delaware corporate law court this week over a shareholder lawsuit that is accusing the company’s board of mismanaging privacy controls and approving a record $5B fine to shield Zuckerberg from personal liability. The trial will begin on Wednesday and go on for eight days. The case goes back to Meta’s 2019 settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ), following the Cambridge Analytica scandal in which the personal data of millions of users of the app was harvested through a third-party app and shared without consent. Meta’s shareholders have alleged that the company’s board breached its fiduciary duties by failing to uphold a 2012 FTC consent decree, and that the $5B settlement was unjustly high and designed to protect Zuckerberg’s personal interests rather than serve the company or its shareholders. The lawsuit was filed by three minority shareholders and names several prominent current and former directors, including venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Investor Peter Thiel, Netflix’s co-founder Reed Hastings, Kenneth Chenault, the former American Express CEO, and Jeff Zients, a former Biden adviser. All of these individuals are expected to testify. Caremark claim moves ahead in Delaware court The trial is especially notable as it is one of the first “Caremark” claims in Delaware. Caremark lawsuits are those alleging a board’s failure to oversee corporate compliance. Historically, such claims struggle to survive early dismissal. The plaintiffs claim that Meta’s board approved the $5B FTC fine without conducting an internal investigation, thereby protecting Zuckerberg from being named personally in the FTC case. They further claim that Zuckerberg unlawfully sold billions in company stock while possessing material non-public information about Facebook’s undisclosed data-sharing practices. In court filings, Meta and the defendants deny these allegations. They argue that the company’s directors did not knowingly violate the 2012 consent decree and acted prudently within their fiduciary duties. Meta maintains that, after the decree, the company implemented “a robust system of privacy controls,” and that there is no evidence of misconduct from the board. Despite these defenses, the core Caremark claim has already survived Meta’s motion to dismiss. Sandberg has also already faced sanctions in the case. The court sanctioned her earlier this year for deleting Gmail messages after being notified of the lawsuit. Sandberg stepped down from her role as Meta’s COO in 2022 and left the board in 2024. Meta’s market capitalization has grown to nearly $2T. The lawsuit has revived longstanding concerns about how aggressively the company pursued growth at the expense of user privacy and public trust. Critics argue Meta’s pursuit of engagement led to its mishandling of systemic data and amplified online harms such as misinformation and hate speech. Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, who will oversee the Meta case, also made headlines in 2024 for rescinding Tesla’s $55B pay package for CEO Elon Musk. The lawsuit has prompted unease among tech leaders like the venture capital firm, Andreessen Horowitz, co-founded by Meta board member Marc Andreessen, which announced its plans to move its incorporation from Delaware to Nevada. The firm cited “unprecedented subjectivity” in Delaware’s judicial decisions. “What’s at stake is the trust of the company — not just for the users but for the shareholders,” Jason Kint, the CEO of the online publishing group Digital Content Next, said regarding the matter. Your crypto news deserves attention - KEY Difference Wire puts you on 250+ top sites

Crypto 뉴스 레터 받기
면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.