cryptonews
2025-12-26 04:42:54

Uniswap Governance Approves UNIfication Proposal in Near-Unanimous Vote

Uniswap governance has approved the UNIfication proposal, marking a major shift in the protocol’s economic model and setting UNI on a more explicitly deflationary path. Key Takeaways: Uniswap approved UNIfication with near-unanimous support, putting UNI on a deflationary path. The fee switch redirects trading fees to ongoing UNI burns tied to protocol usage. The proposal also streamlines governance and funding to support long-term growth. Voting concluded on Thursday with 99.9% support, according to Uniswap founder Hayden Adams . More than 125 million UNI tokens were cast in favor of the proposal , compared with just 742 tokens voting against, underscoring broad consensus among token holders. Uniswap Proposal Activates Long-Awaited Protocol Fee Switch The proposal, introduced in November by Uniswap Labs and the Uniswap Foundation, activates the long-anticipated protocol fee switch. Under the new structure, a portion of trading fees, previously distributed entirely to liquidity providers, will now be directed to the protocol itself. Those fees will be used to burn UNI tokens on an ongoing basis, reducing total supply over time. In addition, net sequencer fees from Unichain will be routed into the same burn mechanism. Together, the changes create a direct link between usage and supply reduction. As trading activity increases across Uniswap, more UNI will be removed from circulation, effectively tying the token’s economics to the protocol’s growth. Beyond fee mechanics, UNIfication also streamlines Uniswap’s operational structure. The proposal transitions Uniswap Foundation teams and responsibilities into Uniswap Labs, removes fees from Labs’ interface, wallet, and API services, and establishes a recurring growth budget funded by UNI. Voting has concluded on Unification 125,342,017 YES 742 NO Unified, true to the name After a ~2day vote timelock, 100m UNI will be burned, fee switches will be flipped, labs will turn off frontend fees and focus on the protocol, and more Merry Christmas everyone https://t.co/wpsEC8udlW pic.twitter.com/P0rJmLN9Cc — Hayden Adams (@haydenzadams) December 25, 2025 That budget is designed to support long-term development and ecosystem expansion rather than short-term incentives. Following approval, the proposal enters a two-day timelock, after which Uniswap will execute a one-time burn of 100 million UNI. The figure represents an estimate of how much UNI might have been burned had the fee switch been active since the token’s launch. The governance package also introduces a Protocol Fee Discount Auctions system designed to improve returns for liquidity providers while aligning Uniswap Labs, the Uniswap Foundation, and on-chain governance under a single legal structure using Wyoming’s DUNA framework. Several influential figures in decentralized finance backed the UNIfication proposal, including Variant founder Jesse Waldren, Synthetix and Infinex founder Kain Warwick, and former Uniswap Labs engineer Ian Lapham, all of whom hold substantial voting power. Uniswap Cites Shift in Regulatory Climate as It Moves Toward Value Capture The move comes after years of regulatory pressure on DeFi under former SEC Chair Gary Gensler. In the proposal, Uniswap argued that the regulatory landscape has shifted and that decentralized finance has reached a stage of broader acceptance, making it possible to implement protocol-level value capture. “I believe Uniswap protocol can be the primary place tokens are traded,” Adams said, adding that the proposal “sets the stage for the next decade of its growth.” UNI was trading at $5.92 as of late Thursday, up 18.9% over the past week. Uniswap has generated more than $1.05 billion in fees so far this year, highlighting the scale of activity now feeding into its new economic model. The post Uniswap Governance Approves UNIfication Proposal in Near-Unanimous Vote appeared first on Cryptonews .

Get Crypto Newsletter
Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.